Recently, @gillyberlin posted a link to an article up on engadget. It’s basically a rather boring (in the sense of „there are loads of articles like it online EVERYWHERE“) article covering stuff that happens at MWC (mobile world congress) 2013 in Barcelona. The text about the design philosophy at LG is actually pretty short because it’s actually the interview with Chul Bae Lee of LG what makes the post interesting. Wait. The interview actually is not that interesting, unless you’re into smartphones and stuff. What was way more interesting below in the comments. Unfortunately they seem to have been turned of while I was still thinking about writing this post so I can’t provide you with some of the “gems” hidden in the comments. But believe me, they were … how do you put this … not only heated but there was a ton of trolling, harassment and insulting going on because of…..*wait for it* …the person doing the interview. READ THAT TWICE. The author was not only laughed at but severely harassed because quite a number of people *felt* that the look of the author did not *fit* the event. Are you fucking kidding me? Let’s start with the obvious. Personally, I think that the video is interesting and that the author asks interesting questions and the interviewee gives some nice answers, though I’m not really into all the hype that goes on at MWC and with all „latest, brightest, most special,…“-news stuff. You can discuss the questions and tone that the author uses in the interview and I’m sure that people who know more about that kind of journalism can give critical feedback on it. Now on to the more interesting stuff: I think that the tech-scene and news sites covering tech are inherently superficial. That’s okay, it’s al about buzz, marketing, products, aesthetics and stuff. The more interesting part. I think it’s everybody’s FUCKING right to dress as they please unless they walk around naked. Okay, even that may be the okay, depending the circumstances, so it depends. Where do we draw the line? I suggest we apply the following questions : is the person violating a law? is the person **directly** insulting other people through his/her/…. clothing? (I’m thinking about shirts with insulting slogans on it) does the clothing transport some kind of political message? (wearing a SS-uniform would be one of the more obvious/ugly examples) If the answer to one of these questions is a firm „yes“, an interviewer’s style and clothing may be subject of debates, though we should stick to acceptable forms of critique. If the answer is no, all critique boils down to one simple point: **individual taste**. Old vs. new I know that we don’t live in a happy-happy-joy-joy-world where everybody can dress on the job as she/he/… pleases, especial in rather conservative environments. I live in Germany for fuck’s sake, don’t tell me about it. But even in conservative German banks and insurance companies, things start to loosen a bit. You[…]
Und weil ich gerade so schön dabei war hier Bilder zu posten, schiebe ich das hier nach. Einen längeren Eintrag schreibe ich heute Abend. Promise. (gefunden habe ich das Bild auf Amanda Palmer’s Tumblr.
Ich verlinke ja eigentlich schon lange keine Bilder oder Videos mehr, vielleicht ändere ich das aber auch wieder. Mal sehen. Ich finde dieses Buch-Design einfach unglaublich gut. Wow. Das Bild stammt von Steve Kovach ‘s Tumblr.